Over the years I have been in a large number of use of force courses and use of force discussions as a student and an instructor. When the topic gets around to the use of deadly force and the options available to officers if they believe they are in a fight for their life I very often hear trainers and officers say that they officer can "Do whatever it takes to win that fight." I agree with that in principle however, what concerns me is that the discussion often stops there and that should never be acceptable.
If I am teaching the class or leading the discussion I will probe further and ask officers what that means to them, what force response options they have available and what type of things can they do to win the fight? These questions almost always result in generic answers such as:
- Whatever it takes.
- Whatever I need to use to win.
- anything in the environment.
- anything that can cause death or grievous bodily harm.
- Etc.
- Shooting a subject with the officer's issued firearms.
- Striking a subject in the head, neck or spine with a baton.
- Striking a subject in the head, neck or spine with a flashlight.
- Striking a subject in the head, neck or spine with a radio.
- Striking a subject in the head, neck or spine with a rock, brick, log or 2 x 4.
- Striking a subject in the throat with a fist, forearm or elbow.
- Gouging a subject's eye out.
- Stabbing a subject in the face or neck with a pen.
- Running a subject down with a vehicle.
- Throwing a subject off an overpass, balcony or rooftop.
- Using a folding knife that the officer carries as a general purpose utility tool or rescue tool to stab or slash a subject in the throat, neck or other vital area.
For the sake of your officers please do not accept generic answers to in these discussions during your class. Ask more questions. Get specifics and set your officers up to succeed.
Take care.
Brian Willis
Winning Mind Training
Warrior Spirit Books - The Home of 'Must Read' books including W.I.N. Volumes 1 and 2

Comments